In a scene of Leaving Neverland accuser James Safechuck alleges that Michael Jackson had molested him in virtually every corner of Neverland, including in open and rather public spaces such as the pool or the theater. The whole scene seemed like a rundown on every notable area at Neverland in an attempt to sully and pollute them with “sexual abuse” imagery in the viewer’s mind.
Mind you, in his complaint Safechuck portrays Jackson as a paranoid abuser who would go great lengths not to get detected. He claims, among other things that Jackson supposedly run “drills” with him like this :
Or that Jackson would mess up the bedroom where James should have slept so that staff would not notice that instead he had slept in Jackson’s bed .
According to Safechuck’s allegations, Jackson went as far as to prepare him and practice what police would tell him in the future (even though there was no trace of any police investigation in Jackson at the time yet) .
Jackson was generally very careful, according to Safechuck’s complaint :
Taking a cue out of a prosecution theory during the 2005 trial, both Safechuck and Wade Robson put a great emphasis on the alarm bell that was installed in Jackson’s room. The prosecution and the media attempted to portray it as something sinister, but objectively we are simply talking about a bell that rings when someone enters the downstairs section of Jackson’s room. It is perfectly understandable when we know that often there were dozens or even hundreds of people staying and walking around at Neverland – guests, fans and staff alike. Obviously molesting children is not the only option why an international celebrity would want to get a warning when someone enters his private quarters. When we talk about Jackson’s bedroom, it is a two-storey complex, as big as other people’s whole apartment is. Basically it was Jackson’s private suite with a family room downstairs and a bedroom upstairs.
Nevertheless, in 2005 the prosecution made a big deal of the alarm bell (ironically, it eventually helped to exonerate Jackson – you can read here how), and now we see it emphasized in both Safechuck‘s and Robson‘s complaints as well. From Safechuck’s :
The suggestion is clear in the complaint and becomes even more clear in the film that they basically allege that Jackson had installed the alarm bell to be able to detect it if anyone approached while he was supposedly molesting kids.
With that in mind it is certainly weird then that in the film Safechuck tells about Jackson allegedly molesting him basically all over Neverland: in the pool (which, by the way, was surrounded by cameras), in the jacuzzi, in the theater, in the teepees in the Indian village, upstairs in the arcade, in the memorabilia house, in the castle in the theme park and in an upstairs room at the train station. When he finishes listing all the locations where he was allegedly molested, Safechuck notes in the film: “it happened every day”.
What was the point of the alarm bell in Jackson’s room and all the other paranoid precautions (like supposed “drills”) if he then took James out to open and very much public spaces to molest him “every day”, where they could have been caught any time?
But leaving this little plot hole behind us for now, let’s move on to the main topic of this article: Safechuck’s allegation that he was molested at the train station. He says in the film: “At the train station, there’s a room upstairs. And we would have sex up there too.”
Here is the clip of him saying it: https://streamable.com/pfdze
Now, as you can see from this short clip above (in courtesy of Geraldine Blondeau) there is a big problem with that claim: the train station did not exist until late 1993-early 1994!
This is more than a little, insignificant memory lapse by Safechuck. These are actually the kind of blunders and red flags that are usually signs of false allegations constructed in the hindsight. It is not just that James got a date wrong – that can happen. But here he alleged sexual abuse specifically in the upstairs room of a pretty iconic building of Neverland that did not even exist at the time of his alleged abuse! Additionally, please consider that he claimed that the molestation at these locations happened regularly, “every day”.
This is the building we are talking about – one of the most recognizable, most iconic buildings of Michael Jackson’s Neverland Ranch.
There is evidence to prove that it did not exist during the time period when Safechuck alleges his sexual abuse happened.
In a photo taken in August 1993, you can see that there is nothing yet at its later location.
In a December 1993 article (during the Chandler allegations) it was reported that the train station was being built then.
And the final evidence. The permission to begin the construction of the Neverland train station was approved by authorities on September 2, 1993. The construction then finished in 1994. (In courtesy of documents obtained by MJJ Repository)
By the time the construction of the building finished Safechuck was 16 years old. There is no allegation that Jackson molested him at 16. In actuality, his whole narrative in the complaint and the film alike is that when he reached puberty Jackson lost interest and moved on to the next “victim” (ie. Brett Barnes who denies being a victim).
Safechuck’s allegation is that his alleged abuse happened between 1988 and 1992. Here it is in his own words from his declaration.
Here is it again from a Probate Court filing by Safechuck :
It is repeated several times throughout Safechuck’s court documents that he alleges his sexual abuse took place between 1988-1992, when he was 10-14 years old.
Considering that Jackson went on a world tour in June 1992 (where he did not take Safechuck with him), that is about the last date any sexual abuse claim would fit into Safechuck’s timeline.
In any case, the train station is virtually impossible to fit into his timeline. It was not built until 1994. It was finished after the Chandler allegations. Safechuck turned 16 in February 1994. There is no claim that Jackson molested him at 16 or at any time after the Chandler allegations. In actuality, in the film Safechuck claims that by the time of the 1993 Chandler allegations Jackson had become “a little bit absent” from his life and he only contacted him again for the Chandler allegations because he needed him to testify for him.
It is not just a little, insignificant mistake about dates. It is that Safechuck alleges to have been molested specifically in a room and in a building (a pretty iconic building) that did not even exist during the relevant time! Please also take note of the fact that Safechuck alleges that the molestation at these locations was a regular occurrence: “it happened every day”.
Defenders of Safechuck tried to explain this away by saying things like perhaps he was abused at another train station at Neverland, but the other train stations are not buildings, just platforms. Here are those:
This is just one another problem with Safechuck’s allegations, but by far not the only one. His allegations have never come under the same scrutiny in court as Robson’s because his case never even got as far in the court system (it was thrown out at the demurrer stage, while Robson’s went further in the summary judgement stage). So Safechuck and his family never got deposed and no discovery has ever been done on them. Still, even just reading his complaint and watching Leaving Neverland, we can already discover a number of big problems with his allegations.
UPDATE: The train station issue made big waves in the media in the first week of April 2019 (at least in the UK), and in answer to that the director of the film, Dan Reed took it to Twitter to defend James Safechuck’s and his film’s credibility. He argued that it does not matter if the train station was built in 1994, because Safechuck’s abuse continued after the construction of the train station as well.
He tweeted on April 2:
Then he repeated this argument on April 4:
The problem is: it is not what Safechuck alleged in his lawsuit and neither in Reed’s film and subsequent interviews, for that matter. As you can see above, in his court documents his allegation is that his abuse stopped in 1992. He also said in a BBC interview at the end of February 2019 that his alleged abuse happened when he was 10-14 years old (1988-1992) .
In the film itself this “sex all over Neverland” scene was put into the context of the early days of his alleged “sexual-romantic” relationship with Jackson: “It sounds sick, but it’s kinda like when you are first dating somebody, you do a lot of it”, says Safechuck after he is finished describing these alleged “sex scenes”. The film has black screen interludes to clearly separate each time frame. The sexual abuse at the train station discussion is found between the November 1987-January 1990 interludes. (Graphic in courtesy of MJJRepository)
This new claim that Safechuck’s alleged abuse continued after the train station was built (he was 16 then) goes against this whole narrative that is presented in the film about Jackson losing sexual interest in boys when they reached puberty and moving on to his next, younger victim. In actuality, in an interview with Queerty on March 4, Dan Reed himself claimed: “He liked prepubescent boys, and he did have sex with Wade and James up to about the age of 14. Beyond that, I haven’t heard of a victim older than 14.” 
And let’s keep it in mind that in this case the Chandler allegations in 1993 are a big milestone. Safechuck has never claimed (at least so far) that he was molested after the Chandler allegations. In actuality, at the time Jackson did not spend much time at Neverland. He spent most of 1994 in New York recording. Safechuck might have gone back to Neverland and taken photos of the train station after it was finished, but chances are that Jackson was not even there. (It happened very often that guests and friends stayed at Neverland while Jackson was not even there.) In any case, Safechuck’s allegation was that his alleged abuse stopped in 1992.
One more remark regarding the above tweets by Reed: he claims that the photos of the train station that we can see in his film were taken and provided to him by Safechuck. That clearly shows that Safechuck knew exactly what building he was talking about while he alleged sexual abuse at the train station, he did not mistake it for any other building.
The two photos shown of the train station in Leaving Neverland while Safechuck describes his alleged sexual abuse there:
The same week we also got additional information about how that upstairs room in the train station actually looked like (after the train station was built in 1994, of course). It was not an actual room, but more like a mezzanine floor. Here is a video in which you can see that it did not have a door, anyone could walk up there, and it did not even have an inside wall, just a barrier.
This aligns with Myra Hissami‘s account, who is the girlfriend of Jackson’s long time drummer, Jonathan Moffett .
Jackson would have been pretty much asking to get caught if he had sexually abused anyone there. It especially contradicts the cautious, paranoid portrayal of him in Safechuck’s complaint.
Of course, this only matters if someone would wish to insist on Reed’s explanation that Jackson molested Safechuck after the train station was built. The main issue remains that the train station did not even exist during the period when Safechuck alleges that Jackson abused him.
UPDATE 2: In the second week of April 2019 British tabloids, The Daily Mirror and The Sun (and also in true copy & paste “journalism” fashion, NME) made a desperate and poor attempt at trying to refute the train station evidence. They claimed that they received “bombshell evidence” that proves that Safechuck was telling the truth about being molested at the train station.
This “bombshell evidence” consisted of quotes from two books that supposedly “prove” that the train station existed in 1990.
One book is entitled “Remember the Time – Protecting Michael Jackson in His Final Days”. It was published in 2014 by two of Jackson’s bodyguards, Bill Whitfield and Javon Beard. The passage that the tabloids used as their “evidence”, in context actually does not seem to straight up claim that the train station was there in 1990, but let’s see it :
In the paragraphs before the train station was mentioned it does talk about Neverland’s opening in 1990, but in the paragraph, where the train station is mentioned, it just seems to give a general description of Neverland.
In any case, this book was written by two bodyguards who were not in Jackson’s life and not at Neverland in the early 1990s. The same can be said about their ghostwriter, Tanner Colby who most probably wrote this passage.
In the Introduction of the same book we can read that Whitfield and Beard worked for Jackson in his last years, from December 2006 until his death in June 2009 .
By 2006 Jackson moved out of Neverland. Whitfield and Beard never worked at Neverland, let alone in the relevant time period, in the early 1990s and they have no first hand knowledge of what was there during those early years. Their ghost writer probably just used secondary sources to describe Neverland and those descriptions probably came from later years.
A day later Whitfield indeed confirmed on Twitter that he does not have knowledge about how Neverland looked like in the early 1990s and he did not appreciate the media misinterpreting their book .
Something similar can be detected with the second “bombshell evidence” the tabloids used. It is from a book entitled “Untouchable – The Strange Life and Tragic Death of Michael Jackson” by Randall Sullivan. It was published in 2012. The relevant passage goes as follows :
Sullivan has never been to Neverland, let alone in the relevant time period in the early 1990s. He uses secondary sources as well, and often his own fantasy. His book is sloppy and is full of incorrect, inaccurate information – this one is just one of the many.
In fact, when we check out the source list at the end of his book for Chapter 6 (where the train station reference is), we find that for the description of Neverland he used a video by the Santa Barbara County Sheriff’s department. That video was made in 2003 during the raid of Neverland.
It is obvious that evidence like the actual construction permit for the train station (approved in September 1993), a newspaper article from 1993 (which shows the train station being under construction in December 1993), photo archives (that show there was nothing at the spot of the train station before September 1993) are relevant evidence that would be accepted in Court, unlike extracts from two books written by people who have never been to Neverland during the relevant time period and who simply made (mistaken) assumptions about what Neverland might have looked like.
Moreover, Allan Scanlan, who worked at Neverland as the Director of Maintenance between 1990-2005, also confirmed that the train station was built in 1993.
Another attempted argument made for Safechuck by the tabloids is that he might have mistaken the train station for some other building like the train shed (which, by the way, does not have a second floor). We already addressed this argument above: Dan Reed says that Safechuck provided the photos of the train station used in his film, which means Safechuck knew exactly what building he was talking about and it was not mistaken for any other building.